cuttleflow
Commons
Why we publishOpen · versioned · capacity-neutral

We publish our wordings.

Dozens of Australian agencies redraft substantially the same professional indemnity and D&O clauses. That is deadweight cost with zero differentiation — so we published ours, open and versioned like software, free to use with your capacity provider’s approval.

The library

Eight financial-lines wordings, published as HTML and as Word originals.

The library is served from a public GitHub repository, so that every change to a wording is a tracked, reviewable diff rather than a new file in a shared drive. All eight are working drafts, marked DRAFT — SUBJECT TO LEGAL REVIEW — NOT FOR USE, and none may be issued or bound until Wording Partner sign-off.

See all eight wordings →

Taking part

Two routes in, deliberately kept apart.

Anyone can comment on a wording — sign in with a GitHub login. If you would rather change the words themselves, a free GitHub account lets you edit the wording text directly in your browser and send the change to us; GitHub records which words you added or removed. Neither route changes a published wording on its own — a change is made only after review and sign-off, and is then released as a new version.

How contributions work →

The argument

Markets have solved this before.

Derivatives markets did it with standard master agreements; the London market did it with a shared clause library. In both cases competition moved off the boilerplate and onto the things that differentiate a business — appetite, service and price. Nobody wins a risk because their definition of “professional services” is idiosyncratic; they just pay a lawyer to make it so.

A wording is infrastructure. Treating it like software — versioned, diffable, tested, published — makes it auditable in a way a Word document in a shared drive never is.

How it works

01

Versioned in public

Every wording carries a version. Changes are diffs with reasons, not silent replacements — so you can prove which words were on risk at the moment of bind.

02

Adversarially audited

Each wording is attacked before publication by a reader whose job is to find the hole — coverage gaps, circular definitions, orphaned defined terms. We publish the process; the findings stay in the workshop.

03

Yours to use

Free to adopt with your capacity provider’s approval, on an open licence. Adopting them is never a condition of using anything else we build.

Wording partners

Open wordings still need lawyers.

Publishing a wording removes the cost of drafting it from scratch — it does not remove the need for legal review against your appetite and capacity terms, or for counsel when a claim comes in. A panel of independent Australian insurance law firms familiar with the library — to be announced — is available to be engaged directly for wording and claims work on Commons-based policies. They do not endorse or stand behind the wordings; they are simply willing to work with them, for their own clients, on their own terms.

See the wording partners →

Open protocols

The language of the market belongs to the market.

The same principle applies to the rails. Australian commercial placement still moves over a proprietary, vendor-owned message rail designed in the EDI era. We intend to publish the venue’s placement protocols — lifecycle, message formats, schemas, and the Australian premium components (state duty, GST, emergency services levy, terrorism premium) as named, defined fields — openly and royalty-free, for anyone to implement, including our competitors. That grant would be made in the protocol documents themselves, is intended to survive a change of control and not to be withdrawn from documents already published; breaking changes would carry six months’ notice; and published mappings to established international standards mean nobody has to abandon what they already built.

Running code first: the protocol documents what the venue actually runs, and a change publishes as standard only after it operates in production — where document and venue disagree, the document gets corrected. Open protocols do not mean an open-source operator: the matching engine, the sealed-bid clearing mechanism and the ledger remain ours. The commitment is to the language of the market; the machinery that speaks it stays ours.

Where this is up to

The Meridian financial-lines suite is drafted and subject to legal review, and readable now under CC BY 4.0 — as drafts, not as wordings you can bind. The open-protocols grant sits in the protocol documents themselves, which publish at the venue’s go-live. Ask us for the current state and we will tell you.